
This article appeared in Medpage Today.
Are physicians in Europe more curious than physicians in the United States? I get that impression after reading headlines from the recent study about soccer players and heart screenings in England:
In fact, many local reactions to this study, and the heart screening studies before it, have become very predictable. They are quick to raise doubts and cast judgments, like “screening fails to predict most heart deaths.” As a parent, patient, and advocate, I find these reactions to be very … curious.
Curiosity has played a tremendous role in my life. My son died 13 years ago. Everyone assumed it was sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). However, our pediatrician was curious. She said, “Get your hearts checked, because babies just don’t die.” As a result, Phyllis, Simon’s mom, was diagnosed with Long QT syndrome. Long QT has been linked to up to 15% of all SIDS deaths and is one of several conditions that lead to sudden cardiac arrest in children.
If we’re open to it, this study raises some great questions and reveals some areas for improvement. Here are a few that jumped out at me:
I’m biased. My son died from an undetected heart condition. My organization, Simon’s Heart, has helped students discover heart conditions. Parents have thanked me for saving their child’s life. But, even I don’t reach a conclusion from this study. I remain curious. How many students really die from undetected heart conditions? How many kids saved with an AED device were cleared during a wellness check or sports physical? What is the best way to screen kids to prevent sudden cardiac arrest? I hope that you’ll remain curious too.

Simon's Fund (dba Simon's Heart) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions are tax-deductible to the extent permitted by law.
Website powered by Hopeworks Technology Solutions